Pros & Cons of the strategic alliance - LA BC - ISC
Pros & Cons of the strategic alliance - LA BC - ISC
Of this Alliance. Pros and cons of this alliance setup.
So first general alliance, what is attributed. And then for each individual company in case there is extra
For the general alliance
Pros
- Information exchange
- Profit increase
- Experience
- Win-win business strategy for LA and BLS
- If LA agreed to pick up the capital costs of an improvment project, the benefits, for the most part, would be split by the two parties
- Contract lenght (10 years)
- Min 10 years contract allows for stability
- No need for constant renegotiation
- Promotes trust
- Cost structure - LA pays direct cost + fee
- Simplicity
Cons
- How much “trust” they’re putting on trust.
- Loose structure of the alliance
- Contract doesn't have specific values, only formulas --> things can change a lot over time
- Both have opened themselves to future legal issues
- What if top management changes
- Cost structure - LA pays direct cost + fee
- Promotes inefficiencies
- Lack of specific direction
For LA
Pros
- Information
- Access to new market: A strategic alliance could provide LA with access to new markets, particularly in regions where it lacks a strong presence.
- Reduced cost(fix cost become variable cost & marginal cost decreased)
- Focus more resources on core business
- Is it reducing their capital? Authoritative distribution to BLS?
- BLS takes weight off LA
- Capital savings
- Improved costumer service level
- Lower cost distribution
- Avoided LA to rewrite their whole system from scratch on their own
- Simpler distribution sheme
- LA distribution employees can work in a company that specializes in wha they do
- LA distribution employees have access to better training
- Resupply shops in under 48h
- Access to new systems in compressed time frame
- New ways of doing business
- Improved performance
- Positive momentum from the alliance helped gain investors confidence
Cons
- Will be affected by the BLS&FEDEX strike & their service quality
- Lack of supply chain control and reliance on outsourcing parties
- Uncertainty about costs(delivery cost will effect by many aspects & if someday have a cheaper way to deliver the long-term alliance will prevent to reduce cost)
- BLS could say bye bye we are good.
- Loss of control: Entering a strategic alliance inherently involves relinquishing some degree of control over decision making
- Selling the whole distribution department to BLS
- No penalties if BLS misses service --> low accountability
- Total failure if BLS dies
For BLS
Pros
- Enter to European market
- Enter clothing business
- Utilise existing international loading capacity
- Establish themselves as a global business
- Learning about close connection with company
- Define its business in an area with tremendous future growth potential
- They could show that FedEx-BLS was the only company capable of providing a tailored global solution
- Leverage the idea of global partenr to other costumers
- Pilot project and understand results
Cons
- Decline in LA performance will lead to default on advance payments
- Reputation damage if the alliance goes wrong
- Amount of commitment BLS puts in reduces over time